Monday, September 19, 2016

Reining in progress

-->


Much is being said about self-driving cars. In fact, the government is about to issue policy on them, and knowing how the government works, that can’t end well.

There are a lot of unanswered questions: In a game of chicken, who is more likely to win — a driverless car or one with an adolescent behind the wheel? If someone in a conventional vehicle cuts off a driverless car, how will the driverless car flip off the driver of the conventional car? Or will the driverless car be equipped with special “get back at you” devices we don’t know about yet?

Is the goal to do away with regular cars and pickup trucks and become a nation of passengers in cars that have all the control? What will happen to aimless Sunday afternoon drives with no particular destination in mind? What will we do with all those unemployed driver’s ed teachers? What will backyard mechanics tinker on?

I’m not so sure about driverless cars. When I was in elementary school, the Junior Scholastic magazine — or was it the Weekly Reader? — predicted flying cars and jet packs. In fact, if the magazines had predicted correctly, we’d all have them by now. Imagine flying around a traffic jam in your flying car. Or strapping on a jet pack and just zooming off to a distant city in a matter of minutes.

In fact, I’m really disappointed that no one has perfected the flying cars by now. We Baby Boomers were promised those, and we feel cheated. Driverless cars? Phooey! Give us a car that can fly! Just imagine the chaos we could cause with that; rush hour would take on a whole new meaning.

If scientists want to do something useful and keeping within the magical promises of the Weekly Reader, come up with something more practical. I’d love to see a trash can that wheels itself out to the curb on pickup day. All week long it sits in the garage or just outside the back door for easy loading, and then on pickup day its motor kicks in and it scoots over to curb where the trash truck unloads it and then it ambles on back to start over again.

We have self-propelled vacuum cleaners. Why not a self-propelled cart that collects the mail from the mailbox? And is equipped with sensors that will put mail in to be collected and put up the red flag alerting the postal carrier? That would be so handy on snowy or rainy days.

I’ve heard there’s talk about programmable shopping carts; the shopper keys in what’s on the grocery list and turns the cart loose. Imagine the money you could save from impulse purchases. But if you forgot to put an item on the list, you’re pretty much out of luck. That idea needs work.

I might be inclined to consider a driverless car if it had self-cleaning features, if it could hover over an icy road instead of sliding on it, or if it would load its own trunk after the programmable shopping cart finished at the grocery store.

But on the whole, I’d rather have a jet pack.

Tuesday, September 13, 2016

Defeated by technology




We’ve all been through the agony of dealing with Tech Support because of the gadgets we can’t seem to live without. Here’s a new spin on the problem, and it doesn’t involve people with funny accents who make you feel stupid because you aren’t as gadget-literate as they are.

It involves one of the satellite TV companies that has been in negotiations with local stations over broadcasting rights. The two entities – the satellite company  and the local stations — can’t agree on a price. It’s between them, right?

Wrong. The local stations have in effect said if they can’t have their way they will take their bat and glove and go home. Nyah! Does that anger the satellite company? Maybe. But I doubt it. It’s just another annoyance to get over until they reach an agreement, which one day they will. It’s been done before.

However, the people who have nothing at all to do with these negotiations are the ones being impacted: The viewers. When the local stations became unavailable it was on a day of a big rainstorm, and I assumed the satellite was out. Then I found it odd that the storm had passed and the cable channels were back on, but the local channels weren’t. That’s when I called and learned about the negotiations. That’s the last time I had two-way communication with a communication conglomerate.

The person on the line who told me about the dispute said I could go online and voice my opinion. I could go on line all right. But for the life of me I couldn’t find where I could leave my opinion. If I had found one, I would have told both sides of the issue that viewers are the ones writing checks for the service they’re not getting, and we’re the ones being affected.

So because these bozos, my whole morning is thrown out of whack. I wake up with the morning news. I know when a certain news program comes on I get up and feed the cats and take a pill I take 30 minutes before breakfast. When the program shifts to another segment, I know I can eat breakfast, and then as I get ready for work I can tell what time it is by what programs are on the tube. During this time I know what the weather is going to be and that tells me what to wear.

But I can’t tell them that because the website I was directed to apparently doesn’t want to know. The web site invited me to type in my ZIP code to see how the negotiations are going in my area, and when I did it said I was lucky because it wasn’t affecting my area.  But it didn’t tell me how I could respond to beg to differ. It clearly doesn’t want to know what I think.

Yet, it sends me a bill and expects me to pay in full for partial service. So here’s my message whether they want it or not: Get off your greedy backsides, put the local stations back on the air, and solve your own problems without involving me and other viewers. We got enough problems dealing with tech support for our computers.

One upside: That commercial for cable TV where the guy makes funny noises with his mouth and singers repeat the company’s phone number? I haven’t missed that one bit!